Early skin-to-skin at 22–25 weeks met a thermal test—but only as a protocol
Across 125 sessions in 46 infants, skin-to-skin care met the study’s thermal non-inferiority criterion. A wide margin, strict readiness checks and two tube dislodgements keep this a protocol-feasibility signal.
THE HOT TAKE
The signal belongs to the whole thermal-and-transfer protocol—not to skin-to-skin contact stripped of the system that made it work.
This prospective, single-center non-inferiority study followed infants born at 22–25 weeks in Uppsala, Sweden. Of 70 infants born during the study period, 51 were included and 46 contributed temperature data; 20 of those 46 were born at 22–23 weeks. The analysis covered 125 skin-to-skin-care sessions in the first two postnatal weeks, with measurements scheduled at ages 4–6, 6–7, and 11–13 days.
This was not unstructured skin-to-skin care. A session started only after individualized clinical assessment and an axillary temperature of at least 36.5 °C. The unit used a 26 °C room, a standardized insulated nest and blankets, continuous cutaneous temperature monitoring, an extra blanket if skin temperature had not risen after one hour, a minimum two-hour session, secured tubes and lines, and assigned roles for the transfer.
Was this worth carrying into your next shift?
Your reaction stays connected to your NICU360 profile.
Comments
0Join the conversation
Sign in to reply, vote, and keep your participation with your NICU360 profile.